This year, the 66th Cannes International Film Festival
was held from the 16th-25th of May and the run up to the
festival called in the media to write about it celebrating 100 years of Indian
cinema. While Nandita Das and Vidya Balan were on the jury this time, Amitabh
Bachchan, Karan Johar, Sonam Kapoor, Zoya Akhtar and many popular faces of
Bollywood became representatives of our country like every other year. There
was nothing new in that. In fact, in the recent years the Cannes film festival
has come to be associated more with glitz, glamour and showbiz rather than with
what it started off as---- a show of sheer cinematic beauty from all over the
world.
Gone are the days when Mrinal Sen’s Khandahar, Satyajit Ray’s Pather
Panchali (The Song of the Road) and Ritwik Ghatak’s Titash Ekti Nadir
Naam ( A River named Titash) and other Indian films would be the show
stealer at Cannes year upon year. They
made our country proud by winning the Palme D’Or on many occasions. The Indian media has sadly shifted its focus
from the movies to the glamorous world of who’s wearing what at the red carpet.
The actors and actresses featuring in the movies are the show stealers today,
and often the independent cinema that should have been the actual focus, takes
a backseat. So today, we would all know what Sonam Kapoor wore at Cannes
because she is on the front page of the entertainment supplement of every
newspaper and fashion magazine; we would know why Sabyasachi Mukherjee designed
something ‘unique’ and ‘truly Indian’ for Vidya Balan, but not many of us would
know what ‘Monsoon Shootout’, a film by Amit Kumar, which was screened
in the Midnight Projection section of the festival is all about. What an absolute
contrast this is from the Cannes of the 50s, 60s and 70s!
The Indian media made a big deal about the screening of Bombay
Talkies at Cannes as a tribute to the 100 years of Indian cinema but cared
too less to write about the low key, simple and touching tale that was the
focus of Ritesh Batra’s The Lunch Box which received a standing ovation
after its screening. It is the sheer choice to report only the glamorous side
of such an esteemed film festival that has left cine enthusiasts in India
stunned and bewildered. Is it just the media’s bias or a conscious effort to
make fashion the USP of Cannes?
The media’s coverage of the festival has highly been one
sided and even entertainment channels have not bothered to go beyond fulfilling
the audience’s demands. It has been showbiz and entertainment all the way-
entertainment for the predominantly Bollywood movie watching audience. We saw the trend setters, the trend breakers and
we saw who walked hand-in-hand with whom on the red carpet. Sadly, we didn’t get
to see or read much about the absolutely brilliant films that were screened for
12 days at the festival. It makes me wonder if we would, as consumers of various forms of media be able
to wisely differentiate between the Cannes film festival, the Berlin International
film festival, and the IIFA Awards in India any more.
The media can surely
do better. Thus, it is a pity to see that serious Indian cinema
at Cannes is dying a slow death in the hands of the media and making way for
undeserving and unnecessary glamour.
No comments:
Post a Comment